STAFF AFFIRMATIVE ACTION OFFICE
April 12, 1993
KEY ADMINISTRATORS/KEY SUPPORT STAFF
SUBJECT: Staff Affirmative Action Goals Progress Reports
Attached for your review and information is a summary of the University's
progress toward meeting its staff affirmative action goals during the last
reporting year (October 1, 1991 - October 31, 1992). More detailed reports
concerning this activity were distributed by Staff Affirmative Action to Vice
Chancellors/Directors last week. You will note that each major organizational
unit is evaluated as to progress achieved in each of three areas: Diversity
in referral pools for recruited jobs; target achievement in recruited jobs;
and target achievement in non-recruited jobs (e.g., jobs filled via
recruitment waiver, casual to career transfer of the employee and/or
reclassification of existing employees).
Of particular note in this year's report is that a larger proportion of goals
are being met via the reclassification process this year as compared to last.
This is a phenomenon we would expect based on shrinking resources and the fewer
open positions consequently available. Many managers are not aware of the
potentially significant impact on goal achievement that the reclassification
process represents. You are encouraged to evaluate your current work force
whenever opportunities for new job assignments arise in the interest of
enhancing opportunities for underrepresented groups. In this manner, if you
reclassify an existing employee into an underrepresented position, not only will
you be providing an opportunity for the individual, you will also be meeting a
goal for the University.
If you require additional information regarding the attached report or require
clarification of any kind, please feel free to contact me at Ext. 43694.
Delia H. Talamantez
Director
Attachment
==============================================================================
Attachment
Table I
Cumulative Summary of Competitive and Non-Competitive Placements
In Job Groups with Underutilization by UCSD Organizational Units
(October 1, 1991 - October 31, 1992)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
C O M P E T I T I V E^
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | Jobs With Diverse | Placements Which Re-
| Total | Referrals |duced Underutilization
| Place- | |
UNIT | ments | Target Actual | Target Actual
-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------
| (A) | (B) C) (D) | (E) (F) (G)
Academic Affairs | 138 | 53.8% 76 55.1%* | 24.0% 20 26.3%*
SIO | 45 | 89.4% 29 64.4% | 24.0% 12 41.4%*
School of Medicine 387 | 67.1% 226 58.4% | 26.1% 86 38.1%*
Business Affairs | 99 | 66.4% 44 44.4% | 25.2% 11 25.0%
Medical Center | 384 | 53.8% 201 52.3% | 27.2% 134 66.7%*
Student Affairs | 50 | 61.9% 17 34.0% | 24.0% 5 29.4%*
Administration | 34 | 71.4% 21 61.8% | 24.0% 7 33.3%*
Admin. Computing | 2 | 53.8% 1 50.0% | 24.0% 1 100%*
Chancellor's Ofc | 1 | 100% 1 100%* | 33.3% 1 100%*
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total 1,140 | 616 54.0% | 277 45.0%
=============================================================
Table I (Continued)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| NON-COMPETITIVE** | Competitive &
| | Non-Competitive
--------------------|--------------------------------|------------------------
| Total Placements Which | Total Tot.Placements~
| Place- Reduced Under- | Place- which Reduced
| ments utilization | ments Underutilization
--------------------|--------------------------------|------------------------
UNIT | Target Actual |
--------------------|--------------------------------|------------------------
| (H) (I) (J) (K) | (L) (M) (N)
Academic Affairs | 175 13.7% 26 14.9%* | 313 46 14.7%
SIO | 72 14.0% 15 20.8%* | 117 27 23.1%
School of Medicine | 261 12.0% 62 23.8%* | 648 148 22.8%
Business Affairs | 190 23.9% 16 8.4% | 289 27 9.3%
Medical Center | 264 12.0% 26 9.8% | 648 160 24.7%
Student Affairs | 35 12.0% 11 31.4%* | 85 16 18.8%
Administration | 29 16.7% 1 3.4% | 63 8 12.7%
Admin. Computing | 10 21.1% 1 10.0% | 12 2 16.7%
Chancellor's Ofc | 0 12.0% 0 0.0% | 1 1 100%
--------------------|--------------------------------|------------------------
Total | 1,036 158 15.3% | 2,176 435 20.0%
============================================================
*Target Met
^Placed through open recruitment.
(A) Total placements made via the open recruitment process.
(B) Percentage target for diverse referrals from October 1, 1991
to October 31, 1992.
(C) Number of jobs in which the applicant pool included referrals of
individuals from underutilized groups.
(D) Percentage of jobs in which the applicant pool included referrals
of individuals from underutilized groups.
(E) Percentage target for competitive placements to reduce
underutilization from October 1, 1991 to October 31, 1992.
(F) Number of competitive placements which reduced underutilization.
(G) Percentage of competitive placements which reduced underutilization.
**Activity includes reclassifications, exceptions, and
casual-to-career transfers.
(H) Total placements made via the non-competitive placement process.
(I) Percentage target for non-competitive placements to reduce
underutilization from October 1, 1991 to October 31, 1992.
(J) Number of non-competitive placements which reduced underutilization.
(K) Percentage of non-competitive placements which reduced underutilization.
~Combined competitive and non-competitive placements.
(L) Total competitive and non-competitive placements.
(M) Total competitive and non-competitive placements
which reduced underutilization.
(N) Percentage of total competitive and non-competitive placements
which reduced underutilization.
Note: While a normal UCSD reporting year is November 1 through October 31,
this year the reporting period includes 13 months of placement
activity because a University-wide computer system conversion resulted
in only 11 months of data being analyzed last year.
*-*- END