UCSD
CAMPUS NOTICE
University of California, San Diego
 

OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT VICE CHANCELLOR -
CAMPUS BUDGET OFFICE

November 20, 2008


ALL ACADEMICS AND STAFF AT UCSD

SUBJECT:    UC Press Release on 2009/10 Regents' Budget Proposal

The University of California Board of Regents approved a 2009/10 budget proposal for the University on Thursday, November 20, 2008. For your information, below is a press release from the Office of the President. More information on the UC budget is at

http://www.universityofcalifornia.edu/news/budget/

If you have any questions concerning this notice, please contact me at extension 4-5357 or Blair Stephenson at extension 4-6590.


Sylvia Lepe-Askari
Assistant Vice Chancellor -
Campus Budget Office

------------------------------------------------------------------------

REGENTS APPROVE 2009-10 BUDGET PROPOSAL

The University of California Board of Regents today (Nov. 20) approved a 2009-10 budget proposal for the university. In doing so, the Regents also adopted a resolution stating that UC freshman enrollments next fall will be curtailed if the state does not provide sufficient funding, and also an amendment clarifying that the budget does not call for student fee increases but that fee increases will be necessary if the state does not provide sufficient funding to the university.

Regents said they were reluctant to constrain freshman access to the university but that state elected leaders should understand the impact of continuing budget cuts to the university. UC currently enrolls 10,000 more students than it receives state funding for, at a cost to the campuses of $120 million. And the state's per-student spending for education at UC, adjusted for inflation and enrollment growth, has fallen nearly 40 percent since 1990 - from $15,860 in 1990 to $9,560 today in current, inflation-adjusted dollars.

Regents also acted to clarify that the budget proposal does not call for a specific fee increase but requests additional funding from the state in lieu of an increase. If the state does not provide that funding, the university will need to consider student fee increases.

"The situation we face is serious, and some very tough choices are ahead of us," UC President Mark G. Yudof told the Regents in San Francisco.

"We need to preserve access and affordability to the greatest extent possible. We also need to ensure that we're providing students access to an education of the high quality they expect of UC. And we can't leave the state with the impression that we can continue doing more and more with fewer and fewer resources."

Further details about fall 2009 enrollments will be discussed at a future meeting. Regents also are expected to act in early 2009 to set 2009-10 student fee levels, after the governor's January state budget proposal becomes available.

For the current 2008-09 fiscal year, the state reduced its operating support for UC by $48 million, and the governor has proposed another $65.5 million in mid-year cuts. In addition, UC must achieve $100 million in savings in 2008-09 to cover student enrollment growth and inflationary increases in fixed costs that the state budget did not fund. Furthermore, the state is still confronting a major budget gap to address in the 2009-10 state budget.

The board began its budget deliberations by hearing a report from several UC chancellors who described reductions occurring at the UC campuses which may intensify as a result of continuing state budget cuts. Those impacts include delayed and reduced academic programs, slowing recruitment of faculty, more limited student services, and reduced class offerings that could impede students' progress to timely graduation. Campuses across the system also are working to achieve administrative and business efficiencies wherever possible.

The board then took up adoption of the 2009-10 budget proposal for UC, a document that serves as a budget request to the State of California and kicks off the annual state budget process.

UC officials told the Regents that the university recognizes the state's significant fiscal difficulties and intends to work constructively with elected officials on solutions. However, they said, it also is important at the beginning of the process for UC to lay out a plan reflecting the university's true budget needs if it is to continue delivering on its mission for California.

"We need to forcefully articulate what it takes to keep the University of California great," Yudof said. "This is an honest statement of what it takes to sustain quality."

The budget proposal includes funding for enrollment growth, core academic needs, compensation for faculty and staff, and resumed contributions to the UC Retirement Plan. It also includes funding for recommended initiatives including improving graduate student support, restoring instructional program funding cut in earlier budgets, restoring funding for labor research, providing start-up funding for a UC Riverside medical school, and providing operating funds for the California Institutes for Science and Innovation.

The budget also includes a request for funding from the state equivalent to the revenue that would be achieved through a 9.4 percent increase in mandatory systemwide student fees (a 10 percent increase in the Educational Fee and a 4.2 percent increase in the Registration Fee) plus increases in professional school fees. If that funding is not provided by the state, or if the state makes even deeper cuts to the university's budget, the Regents will need to consider student fee increases of at least that amount for 2009-10.

With any fee increase ultimately approved, UC's intention would be to continue providing financial aid to mitigate the impact on families in need. UC sets aside one-third of the revenue from fee increases to provide grants for eligible students to offset the increase, and Cal Grants and federal grants provide assistance as well.

Core operating funds for the university, consisting of state general funds, student fee revenue and other UC operating funds, currently total $5.4 billion and would increase $755 million, or 14 percent, under the adopted 2009-10 proposal. State general funds alone currently total just over $3 billion and would increase $739 million, or 24 percent, if the state was able to provide the funding necessary to cover the university's core needs and also avoid student fee increases.

Separately, the Regents were presented with a revised 2008-09 operating budget for the UC Office of the President in Oakland. The UCOP budget includes both central administrative activities for the UC system and academic programs that are not part of central administration but historically have been counted as part of the UCOP organization. The revised budget reflects further savings of $8.7 million and 97 employees just since the 2008-09 budget was adopted by the Regents in May. In total, the UCOP budget has now fallen $60 million, from $290 million in 2007-08 to $230 million in 2008-09 (a 21 percent reduction), and the workforce has dropped by 500 employees, from 1,873 to 1,373 (a 27 percent reduction). More than half of these reductions (54 percent) represent true savings for the university; the balance (46 percent) represent transfers of programs from UCOP to campuses and other locations more appropriate for administering these programs.

The UCOP budget adopted by the Regents in May reflected a 10 percent budget-cutting effort across all UCOP departments. Since then, the additional savings noted above have been achieved through a voluntary separation program for employees and an effort to consolidate a number of functions previously scattered across UCOP departments, from computer support to business processing.

The Office of the President also has implemented vacancy controls and new pre-approval requirements for purchasing and travel in order to further contain costs at the central office.

The Regents also today approved a capital improvements budget requesting $801.8 million in state lease-revenue bond funding and $40.6 million in existing general obligation bond funding for facilities projects addressing enrollment growth, seismic safety, infrastructure renewal, and telemedicine and medical education.